False Flags: The Case of Jussie Smollett
Are Hate Crime Hoaxes a specific type of False Flag Event?
Author's Note
This example of a false flag event is controversial. Not because of the example itself. Some Anons do not believe that Hate Crime Hoaxes constitute as a False Flag Event. I believe that they do. I left it out of my original article because of this debate. Later on, I thought the debate in itself made this example special enough to get its own post.
The following is my original text. Below is my analysis as to why I think this falls under the False Flag category. Whether you agree with me or disagree with me isn't the point. The point is that you look at the facts, look at my analysis, look at the other side of the argument, and then do your own research. The point is that you think for yourself. I am not here to convince you. The point of my posts are to help you come up with your own ideas and thoughts regarding the written subject.
So let’s begin.
Jussie Smollett, 2019 - Chicago, Illinois, USA
Faking a hate crime in order to advance one's career, get attention, or falsely illustrate racism would be a false flag. While we have had many in the USA recently, the one that gained the most attention was the attack on Jussie Smollett.
Jussie Smollett, an American actor, went to Chicago Police and reported that he had been attacked by two white males. In the attack, Jussie describes having a noose placed around his neck and poured an unknown chemical substance on him while racial and homophobic slurs were being yelled at him. He also stated that one of the white men yelled "MAGA country".
It came out later that the attack was staged by Jussie and two Nigerian brothers. The location was to be within sight of a security surveillance camera so that it could be further publicized.
There was also numerous threatening letters sent to Jussie during that year including one depicting a stick figure hanging from a tree with a gun pointed at it, letters stating "Smollett, Jussie you will die", and "MAGA". Some of the letters contained white powder which was later determined to be crushed up Tylenol.
The event was further sensationalized by US media outlets and politicized by Democrat politicians. Narratives were created and repeated regarding racism as an epidemic issue in the USA and how the MAGA movement was a domestic terrorist group.
The entire fake hate crime and false flag incident backfired on Jussie. He was later convicted of filing a false police report. And his acting career kind of fell apart as he lost his job.
And just so you know, depending on who you listen to hate crimes have supposedly spiked 64% since 2015. However, well over 70% of those were fake. Could this just be another false flag to push a political agenda?
Author's Analysis
Do you remember the three things that make a False Flag? If not, here is a recap.
The event was designed with a particular political goal in mind.
While Jussie Smollet's case wasn't political in the typical sense, it was political within his industry. He took office politics to a whole new level. This event was staged in order to advance his career.
The planners place blame on another party. They are designed to seem as the event was carried out by someone else.
The act itself were done by two Nigerian brothers but was blamed on two white male attackers.
The event is meant to deceive the masses in order to sway opinions, evoke emotions, and create a certain narrative to achieve an end goal.
Jussie was trying to inflate his popularity in order to improve his career options. So here we have an opinion he wanted to evoke in order to achieve the goal of career advancement.
And then we have tools or techniques that were utilized during a False Flag event.
Crisis actors in the form of the attackers by the two Nigerian brothers.
Staged sites for news reporting (like a movie set) in the form of the event itself was chosen because of the security camera, camera angle, and lighting. It was chosen as the stage for the attack by an actor who was familiar with movie sets.
News reporting overly focusing on or sensationalizing the event. The event itself was designed to be big news. What news agency could ignore a headline such as a hate crime against a beloved actor? This was later further overinflated by politicians who used the event to achieve their own political goals.
Dark psychology or psyops in order to heighten public fear, terror, paranoia, opinion, etc. Again, Jussie designed this event to enrage his fan base, make a bigger name for himself, and draw attention to himself. This in itself is persuading public opinion, or at least public attention.
The majority of the argument behind whether this event truly constitutes a False Flag or merely mimics one is because the original plan wasn't to achieve a political agenda. It also came from an actor and not a political group. While other political figures and parties used this event to try to achieve their own political goals, that wasn't Jussie's original intent. The inflated political narrative came strictly after the fact. It wasn’t (to the best of anyone’s knowledge) planned beforehand.
Take any Hate Crime Hoax on an individual basis and would it fall under a political agenda or a personal one? Are Hate Crime Hoaxes a specific type of False Flag event? Was Jussie Smollet's Hate Crime Hoax a true False Flag event?
I really don’t know. I see both sides of the argument. So, I will let you decide.
Sources and Further Reading:
Jussie Smollett: US Actor 'Staged Attack Over Salary'
Despite what mainstream media says, USDOJ shows hate crime rates haven’t substantially increased