WORMSCAN: MENA0 [PART 1]

Mena, Arkansas, base of CIA drug importation.

NOTES: I made a few corrections to spellings and grammar.

The top articles are actually repeats from earlier articles. I originally thought about taking them out but thought better of it. I want to keep the original content as pure as possible. David P Beiter thought it was important enough to include for a second time. After reading through this file, I concur.

Something else to note. I am no longer editing out the address of David P Beiter. It is an address of a place that doesn’t exist. As if his identity weren’t shrouded in mystery already.

Fortier reaches out to the FBI:

FBI FD-302, file no. 4477, May 12, 1995, was written by Agent David Beiter, who received the Kit Kat wrapper from Fortier.

Oklahoma City False Flag Occult State Terror Attack

MENA0
By David P Beiter
[REPRINTED WITH PERMISSION]

Date: Tue Jul 18, 1995 2:21 pm CST
From: Freddi`.A.R..'Ready
EMS: INTERNET / MCI ID: 376-5414
                 MBX: jamiv@verilink.com
TO: * David Beiter / MCI ID: 635-1762

Subject: your request/ brown paper wrapper/ article/ascii/ 40932 bytes
Content-Length: 40889
X-Lines: 125

Please let me know if there is a problem in receiving this ascii uncompressed file intact.

Note that there are CR-LF only at the end of paragraphs.

This file is a raw ascii output of Frame. However, you should be able to reformat it easily with available tools.
"— Ms.Freddi .A.R.."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

This is the story that couldn't be suppressed. An investigative report into a scandal that haunts the reputations of three presidents — Reagan, Bush, and Clinton.

THE CRIMES OF MENA
Article by Sally Denton and Roger Morris
Penthouse
July, 1995

[ABOUT THIS STORY]

The initial suppression of the Seal-archive story created a small tidal wave that surged along the internet, gave right-wing radio another conspiracy to caress, and made headlines from London to San Francisco.

After 11 weeks of line-by-line fact-checking, editing, and legal vetting, after the text had been laid out in final type, photos and artwork arrayed, contracts signed, and publication date fixed, at the last moment — on January 26, 1995 — *Washington Post* Managing Editor Robert Kaiser had put one more nervous hold on the article you now see in *Penthouse*. We pulled the piece in dismay and disgust. Even the *Post's* own ombudsman acknowledged "the uproar" over what she called "the story of the hour."

For us as authors, personally and intellectually, the de facto suppression and resulting sensation were at best a mixed affair. A little like Henry Miller's *Tropic* titles, banned in Boston, our article was, ironically, receiving more attention unprinted that it might have drawn had it appeared as scheduled. Yet in their inevitable self-justification, *Post* editors were also impugning us as journalists, and the still-invisible piece was inevitably caught up in wild speculation or anti-Clinton mania that in many ways obscured the deeper, wider importance of what we had reported.

This was, after all, the thoroughly documented story of an enormous crime — of billions of dollars in gunrunning and drug smuggling done with the apparent collusion and cover-up of the U.S. government. It raised ominous questions not only about Bill Clinton, but about presidents Ronald Reagan and George Bush as well — not simply a single set of scoundrels, but a far larger culture of official lawlessness. And behind the sorry episode at *The Washington Post* was something nearly as sinister — the tragic inability or refusal of a major media institution to confront that malignant dark side of American life and governance, even when presented with unprecedented evidence.

It had all begun almost by accident. As a member of the Association of National Security Alumni, a group of onetime CIA, White House, and other officials devoted to reform in intelligence and foreign policy, Roger Morris had first read about Mena in the organization's newsletter, *Unclassified*, where an article early in the 1992 campaign summarized the fragmentary, largely undocumented accounts of Barry Seal's operation in western Arkansas in the eighties. By the spring of 1993, Morris had started a book on Bill and Hillary Clinton, including their Arkansas background, and had begun to gather a thick file on Mena. Trips and literally dozens of phone calls back and forth to Arkansas added significantly to the sources — many of them sworn, on the record, and previously unreported.

Still, the sheer detail and exact magnitude of the smuggling and money laundering lacked hard evidence. With the exception of a lone account by reporter Bill Plante with producer Michael Singer on the CBS evening news, and two *Wall Street Journal* editorial-page feature pieces by Micah Morrison — all in 1994, and drawing mainly on known sources and accounts — the story remained a silhouette, and largely on the disdained margin of American journalism. Most major papers and networks ignored the scandal. A few, like *Time* or *The Post* itself, had written about it only to ridicule the accusations.

Meanwhile, in summer 1993, Morris shared his bulging Mena files with a close friend and colleague, Sally Denton, whose book on drugs and political corruption in Kentucky, *The Bluegrass Conspiracy*, was seen by many investigative reporters as a small classic on its kindred subject.

Instantly recognizing the gravity of the material, familiar from her own experience with the censure or aversion of the general media to such reporting, Denton instantly offered to pursue the story herself while Morris concentrated on other aspects of his book. Over the next year, Denton scoured her considerable law-enforcement and underworld sources throughout the nation, calling in or sending packages of an ever-growing mass of new evidence. By late summer 1994, what we called the Seal archive was mostly gathered — more than 2,000 documents, from the smallest receipt to whole volumes of investigation, that left no doubt about at least the seminal crimes in Mena.

Last autumn, we first submitted a brief op-ed version of the piece to *The New York Times*, which promptly turned it down. This was essentially a *Wall Street Journal* subject that *The Times* had not pursued as reportage, op-ed editor Michael Levitas told Morris. While they had no reason to doubt the documentation or the import of the story, the great gray *Times*, for now, would pass.

Without hesitation, we went next to *The Washington Post*, obviously looking for much the same political impact and mainstream authority. Less than an hour after we had faxed a copy to the *Post's Outlook* section, Deputy Editor Jeffrey Frank called back with warm acceptance and support.

It was obviously an extraordinary article, Frank told us, and though it would have to be thoroughly checked and carefully steered through the paper, he would do all he could to see it published.

Over the next 11 weeks, from early November 1994 to late January 1995, there were repeated delays and postponements, most ascribed to the election aftermath, the new Congress, and the holidays. But Frank and his staff were steady in their editorial commitment and enthusiasm, something Denton saw firsthand in a visit in *Outlook* offices before Christmas.

Meanwhile, as the article was set in galleys, there were numerous faxes back and forth, shipments of documents, photos, and even stills from videotape, and weeks of painstaking checking, editing, and legal review by the *Post's* in-house lawyers, carefully chosen to avoid any potential conflict of interest with attorneys the paper might share somehow with the Clintons.

"Just get everybody on board," Frank said Executive Editor Leonard Downie had told him. And Frank had done just that, as we patiently answered queries from any number of *Post* editors and reporters who had been remotely associated with aspects of the story — far more, we were told later, than to the usual *Outlook* piece. But then, we recognized that this was anything but usual.

At last, on January 25, it all seemed done. Everyone had signed off, we were assured. The galleys were in final form, the contracts signed, and publication was set for a major splash on Sunday the twenty-ninth. Often strained over the weeks of work and marshaling, Frank's own voice seemed audibly relaxed as we began talking about how we would respond to other media questions.

Then suddenly — literally at the last moment — as *Outlook* went to press on January 26, Frank was on the message machine saying Managing Editor Robert Kaiser had held the story yet again. At the same moment, we were being called by the London *Sunday Telegraph*, whose correspondence had been leaked an early version of the piece (by a source high up at *The Post*, we were told) and had learned even before we did that the story was being held once more. He was now planning to file his own dispatch on the whole episode, perhaps including the piece itself.

A bit desperate, we called Bob Kaiser directly, not to lobby further for the story — which Frank had told us would be in vain — but to alert him to the disturbing news of the *Telegraph* leak. But even after Morris explained all that through a secretary, Kaiser refused to come on the line. "He doesn't want to talk to you," she said. Frustrated, furious, convinced that Kaiser was not dealing with the story professionally — and likely never would — we pulled it.

We still don't know why the story was suppressed, though rumors abound — of CIA compromises at *The Post*, of calls from the White House, or some imagined rivalry between Morris's book and a Clinton biography by a longtime *Post* reporter, soon to be serialized and, unusually, promoted in the paper.

Whatever the motives, however, the fact remains that once more, mainstream media had turned away from the dark side, perhaps dreading what it would find there and what it would have to do as a result, perhaps afraid of something of its own reflection.

As so often in the past, the public service of airing stores like Mena would fall to braver outlets, like *Penthouse*. — Sally Denton and Roger Morris.

The Crimes of Mena
by Sally Denton and Roger Morris
Penthouse
July, 1995

Barry Seal — gunrunner, drug trafficker, and covert CIA operative extraordinaire — is hardly a familiar name in American politics. But nine years after he was murdered in a hail of bullets by Medellin cartel hit men outside a Salvation Army shelter in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, he has come back to haunt the reputations of three American presidents.

Seal's legacy includes more than 2,000 newly discovered documents that now verify and quantify much of what previously had been only suspicion, conjecture, and legend. The documents confirm that from 1981 to his brutal death in 1986, Barry Seal carried on one of the most lucrative, extensive, and brazen operations in the history of the international drug trade, and that he did it with evident complicity, if not collusion, of elements of the United States government, apparently with the acquiescence of Ronald Reagan's administration, impunity from any subsequent exposure by George Bush's administration, and under the usually acute political nose of then Arkansas governor Bill Clinton.

The newly unearthed papers show the real Seal as far more impressive and well-connected than the character played by Dennis Hopper in a made-for-TV movie some years ago, loosely based on the smuggler's life. The film portrayed the pudgy pilot as a hapless victim, caught in a cross fire between bungling but benign government agencies and Latin drug lords. The truth sprinkled through the documents is a richer — and altogether more sinister — matter of national and individual corruption.

It is a tale of massive, socially devastating crime, of what seems to have been an official cover-up to match, and, not the least, of the strange reluctance of so-called mainstream American journalism to come to grips with the phenomenon and its ominous implications — even when the documentary evidence had appeared.

The trail winds back to another slightly bruited but obscure name — a small place in western Arkansas called Mena.

Of the many stories emerging from Arkansas of the 1980s that was a crucible to the Clinton presidency, none has been more elusive than the charges surrounding Mena. Nestled in the dense pine and hardwood forests of the Oachita Mountains, some 160 miles west of Little Rock, once thought a refuge for nineteenth-century border outlaws and even a hotbed of Depression-era anarchists, the tiny town has been the locale for persistent reports of drug smuggling, gunrunning, and money laundering tracing to the early eighties, when Seal based his aircraft at Mena's Intermountain Regional Airport.

From first accounts circulating locally in Arkansas, the story surfaced nationally as early as 1989 in a *Penthouse* article called "Snowbound," written by investigative reporter John Cummings, and in a Jack Anderson column, but was never advanced at the time by other media. Few reporters covering Clinton in the 1992 campaign missed hearing at least something about Mena. But it was obviously a serious and demanding subject — the specter of vast drug smuggling with CIA involvement — and none of the major media pursued it seriously. During 1992, the story was kept alive by Sarah McClendon, *The Nation*, and *The Village Voice*.

Then, after Clinton became president, Mena began to reappear. Over the past year, CBS News and *The Wall Street Journal* have reported the original, unquieted charges surrounding Mena, including the shadow of some CIA (or "national security") involvement in the gun and drug traffic, and the apparent failure of then governor Clinton to pursue evidence of such international crime so close to home.

"Seal was smuggling drugs and kept his planes at Mena," *The Wall Street Journal* reported in 1994. "He also acted as an agent for the DEA. In one of these missions, he flew the plane that produced photographs of Sandinistas loading drugs in Nicaragua. He was killed by a drug gang [Medellin cartel hit men] in Baton Rouge. The cargo plane he flew was the same one later flown by Eugene Hasenfus when he was shot down over Nicaragua with a load of contra supplies."

In a mix of wild rumor and random fact, Mena has also been a topic of ubiquitous anti-Clinton diatribes circulated by right-wing extremists — an irony in that the Mena operation was the apparent brainchild of the two previous and Republican administrations.

Still, most of the larger American media have continued to ignore, if not ridicule, the Mena accusations. Finding no conspiracy in the Oachitas last July, a *Washington Post* reporter typically scoffed at the "alleged dark deeds," contrasting Mena with an image as "Clandestination, Arkansas...Cloak and Dagger Capital of America." Noting that *The New York Times* had "mentioned Mena primarily as the headquarters of the American Rock Garden Society," the *Columbia Journalism Review* in a recent issue dismissed "the conspiracy theories" as of "dubious relevance."

A former Little Rock businessman, Terry Reed, has coauthored with John Cummings a highly controversial book, *Compromised: Clinton, Bush, and the CIA*, which describes a number of covert activities around Mena, including a CIA operation to train pilots and troops for the Nicaraguan Contras, and the collusion of local officials. Both the book and its authors were greeted with derision.

Now, however, a new mass of documentary evidence has come to light regarding just such "dark deeds" — previously private and secret records that substantiate as never before some of the worst and most portentous suspicions about what went on at Mena, Arkansas, a decade ago.

Given the scope and implications of the Mena story, it may be easy to understand the media's initial skepticism and reluctance. But it was never so easy to dismiss the testimony and suspicions of some of those close to the matter: Internal Revenue Service Agent Bill Duncan, Arkansas State Police Investigator Russell Welch, Arkansas Attorney General J. Winston Bryant, Congressman Bill Alexander, and various other local law-enforcement officials and citizens.

All of these people were convinced by the late eighties that there existed what Bryant termed "credible evidence" of the most serious criminal activity involving Mena between 1981 and 1986.

They also believed that crimes were committed with the acquiescence, if not the complicity, of elements of the U.S. government. But they couldn't seem to get the national media to pay attention.

During the 1992 campaign, outside advisers and aides urged former California governor Jerry Brown to raise the Mena issue against Clinton — at least to ask why the Arkansas governor had not done more about such serious international crime so close to home. But Brown, too, backed away from the subject. "I'll raise it if the major media break it first," he told aides. "The media will do it, Governor," one of them replied in frustration, "if only you'll raise it."

Mena's obscure airport was thought by the IRS, the FBI, U.S. Customs, and the Arkansas State Police to be a base for Adler Berriman "Barry" Seal, a self-confessed, convicted smuggler whose operations had been linked to the intelligence community.

Duncan and Welch both spent years building cases against Seal and others for drug smuggling and money laundering around Mena, only to see their own law-enforcement careers damaged in the process.

What evidence they gathered, they have said in testimony and other public statements, was not sufficiently pursued by the then U.S. attorney for the region, J. Michael Fitzhugh, or by the IRS, Arkansas State Police, and other agencies. Duncan, testifying before the joint investigation by the Arkansas state attorney general's office and the United States Congress in June 1991, said that 29 federal indictments drafted in a Mena-based money- laundering scheme had gone unexplored. Fitzhugh, responding at the tie to Duncan's charges, said, "This office has not slowed up any investigation... [and] has never been under any pressure in any investigation."

By 1992, to Duncan's and Welch's mounting dismay, several other official inquiries into the alleged Mena connection were similarly ineffectual or were stifled altogether, furthering their suspicions of government collusion and cover-up. In his testimony before Congress, Duncan said the IRS "withdrew support for the operations" and further directed him to "withhold information from Congress and perjure myself."

Duncan later testified that he had never before experienced "anything remotely akin to this type of interference.... Alarms were going off," he continued, "and as soon as Mr. Fitzhugh got involved, he was more aggressive in not allowing the subpoenas and in interfering in the investigative process."

State policeman Russell Welch felt he was "probably the most knowledgeable person" regarding the activities at Mena, yet he was not initially subpoenaed to testify before the grand jury.

Welch testified later that the only reason he was ultimately subpoenaed at all was because one of the grand jurors was from Mena and "told the others that if they wanted to know something about the Mena airport, they ought to ask that guy [Welch] out there in the hall."

State Attorney General Bryant, in a 1991 letter to the office of Lawrence Walsh, the independent counsel in the Iran-Contra investigation, wondered "why no one was prosecuted in Arkansas despite a mountain of evidence that Seal was using Arkansas as his principle staging area during the years 1982 through 1985."

What actually went on in the woods of western Arkansas? The question is still relevant for what it may reveal about certain government operations during the time that Reagan and Bush were in the White House and Clinton was governor of Arkansas.

In a mass of startling new documentation — the more than 2,000 papers gathered by the authors from private and law-enforcement sources in a year-long nationwide search — answers are found and serious questions are posed.

These newly unearthed documents — the veritable private papers of Barry Seal — substantiate at least part of what went on at Mena.

What might be called the Seal archive dates back to 1981, when Seal began his operations at the Intermountain Regional Airport in Mena. The archive, all of it now in our possession, continues beyond February 1986, when Seal was murdered by Colombian assassins after he had testified in federal court in Las Vegas, Fort Lauderdale, and Miami for the U.S. government against leaders of the Medellin drug cartel.

The papers include such seemingly innocuous material as Seal's bank and telephone records; negotiable instruments, promissory notes, and invoices; personal correspondence; address and appointment books; bills of sale for aircraft and boats; aircraft registration, and modification work orders.

In addition, the archive also contains personal diaries; handwritten to-do lists and other private notes; secretly tape-recorded conversations; and cryptographic keys and legends for codes used in the Seal operation.

Finally, there are extensive official records; federal investigative and surveillance reports, accounting assessments by the IRS and DEA, and court proceedings not previously reported in the press — testimony as well as confidential pre-sentencing memoranda in federal narcotics-trafficking trials in Florida and Nevada — numerous depositions, and other sworn statements.

The archive paints a vivid portrait not only of a major criminal conspiracy around Mena, but also of the unmistakable shadow of government complicity. Among the new revelations:

Mena, from 1981 to 1985, was indeed one of the centers for international smuggling traffic. According to official IRS and DEA calculations, sworn court testimony, and other corroborative records, the traffic amounted to thousands of kilos of cocaine and heroin and literally hundreds of millions of dollars in drug profits. According to a 1986 letter from the Louisiana attorney general to then U.S. attorney general Edwin Meese, Seal "smuggled between $3 billion and $5 billion of drugs into the U.S."

Seal himself spent considerable sums to land, base, maintain, and specially equip or refit his aircraft for smuggling. According to personal and business records, he had extensive associations at Mena and in Little Rock, and was in nearly constant telephone contact with Mena when he was not there himself. Phone records indicate Seal made repeated calls to Mena the day before his murder. This was long after Seal, according to his own testimony, was working as an $800,000-a-year informant for the federal government.

A former member of the Army Special Forces, Seal had ties to the Central Intelligence Agency dating to the early 1970s. He had confided to relatives and others, according to their sworn statements, that he was a CIA operative before and during the period when he established his operations at Mena. In one statement to Louisiana State Police, a Seal relative said, "Barry was into gunrunning and drug smuggling in Central and South America... and he had done some time in El Salvadore [sic]."

Another added, "It was true, but at the time Barry was working for the CIA."

In a posthumous jeopardy-assessment case against Seal — also documented in the archive — the IRS determined that money earned by Seal between 1984 and 1986 was not illegal because of his "CIA-DEA employment." The only public official acknowledgment of Seals's relationship to the CIA has been in court and congressional testimony, and in various published accounts describing the CIA's installation of cameras in Seal's C-123K transport plane, used in a highly celebrated 1984 sting operation against the Sandinista regime in Nicaragua.

Robert Joura, the assistant special agent in charge of the DEA's Houston office and the agent who coordinated Seal's undercover work, told *The Washington Post* last year that Seal was enlisted by the CIA for one sensitive mission — providing photographic evidence that the Sandinistas were letting cocaine from Colombia move through Nicaragua. A spokesman for then Senate candidate Oliver North told *The Post* that North had been kept aware of Seal's work through "intelligence sources."

Federal Aviation Administration registration records contained in the archive confirm that aircraft identified by federal and state narcotics agents as in the Seal smuggling operation were previously owned by Air America, Inc., widely reported to have been a CIA proprietary company. Emile Camp, one of Seal's pilots and a witness to some of his most significant dealings, was killed on a mountainside near Mena in 1985 in the unexplained crash of one of those planes that had once belonged to Air America.

According to still other Seal records, at least some of the aircraft in his smuggling fleet, which included a Lear jet, helicopters, and former U.S. military transports, were also outfitted with avionics and other equipment by yet another company in turn linked to Air America.

Among the aircraft flown in and out of Mena was Seal's C-123K cargo plane, christened *Fat Lady*. The records show that *Fat Lady*, serial number 54-0679, was sold by Seal months before his death. According to other files, the plane soon found its way to a phantom company of what became known in the Iran-Contra scandal as "the Enterprise," the CIA-related secret entity managed by Oliver North and others to smuggle illegal weapons to the Nicaraguan Contra rebels. According to former DEA agent Celerino Castilo and others, the aircraft was allegedly involved in a return traffic in cocaine, profits from which were then used to finance more clandestine gunrunning.

FAA records show that in October 1986, the same *Fat Lady* was shot down over Nicaragua with a load of arms destined for the Contras. Documents found on board the aircraft and seized by the Sandinistas included logs linking the plane with Area 51 — the nation's top-secret nuclear-weapons facility at the Nevada Test Site. The doomed aircraft was co-piloted by Wallace Blaine "Buzz" Sawyer, a native of western Arkansas, who died in the crash. The admissions of the surviving crew member, Eugene Hasenfus, began a public unraveling of the Iran-Contra episode.

An Arkansas gun manufacturer testified in 1993 in federal court in Fayetteville that the CIA contracted with him to build 250 automatic pistols for the Mena operation. William Holmes testified that he had been introduced in Mena by a CIA operative, and that he then sold weapons to Seal. Even though he was given a Department of Defense purchase order for guns fitted with silencers, Holmes testified that he was never paid the $140,000 the government owed him. "After the Hasenfus plane was shot down," Holmes said, "you couldn't find a soul around Mena."

Meanwhile, there was still more evidence that Seal's massive smuggling operation based in Arkansas had been part of a CIA operation, and that the crimes were continuing well after Seal's murder. In 1991 sworn testimony to both Congressman Alexander and Attorney General Bryant, state police investigator Welch recorded that in 1987 he had documented "new activity at the [Mena] airport with the appearance of... an Australian business [a company linked with the CIA], and C-130s had appeared..."

At the same time, according to Welch, two FBI agents officially informed him that the CIA "had something going on at the Mena Airport involving Southern Air Transport [another company linked with the CIA]...and they didn't want us [the Arkansas State Police] to screw it up like we had the last one."

The hundreds of millions in profits generated by the Seal trafficking via Mena and other outposts resulted in extraordinary banking and business practices in apparent efforts to launder or disperse the vast amounts of illicit money in Arkansas and elsewhere. Seal's financial records show from the early eighties, for example, instances of daily deposits of $50,000 or more, and extensive use of an offshore foreign bank in the Caribbean, as well as financial institutions in Arkansas and Florida.

According to IRS criminal investigator Duncan, secretaries at the Mena Airport told him that when Seal flew into Mena, "there would be stacks of cash to be taken to the bank and laundered." One secretary told him that she was ordered to obtain numerous cashier's checks, each in an amount just under $10,000, at various banks in Mena and surrounding communities, to avoid filing the federal Currency Transaction Reports required for all bank transactions that exceed that limit.

Bank tellers testified before a federal grand jury that in November 1982, a Mena airport employee carried a suitcase containing more than $70,000 into a bank. "The bank officer went down the teller lines handing out the stacks of $1,000 bills and got the cashier's checks."

Law-enforcement sources confirmed that hundreds of thousands of dollars were laundered from 1981 to 1983 just in a few small banks near Mena, and that millions more from Seal's operation were laundered elsewhere in Arkansas and the nation.

Spanish-language documents in Seal's possession at the time of his murder also indicate that he had accounts throughout Central America and was planning to set up his own bank in the Caribbean.

Additionally, Seal's files suggest a grandiose scheme for building an empire. Papers in his office at the time of his death include references to dozens of companies — all of which had names that began with Royale. Among them: Royale Sports, Royale Television Network, Royale Liquors, Royale Casino, S.A., Royale Pharmaceuticals, Royale Arabians, Royale Seafood, Royale Security, Royale Resorts... and on and on.

Seal was scarcely alone in his extensive smuggling operation based in Mena from 1981 to 1986, commonly described in both federal and state law-enforcement files as one of the largest drug-trafficking operations in the United States at the time, if not in the history of the drug trade. Documents show Seal confiding on one occasion that he was "only the transport," pointing to an extensive network of narcotics distribution and finance in Arkansas and other states. After drugs were smuggled across the border, the duffel bags of cocaine would be retrieved by helicopters and dropped onto flatbed trucks destined for various American cities.

In recognition of Seal's significance in the drug trade, government prosecutors made him their chief witness in various cases, including a 1985 Miami trial in absentia of Medellin drug lords; in another 1985 trial of what federal officials regarded as the largest narcotics-trafficking case to date in Las Vegas; and in still a third prosecution of corrupt officials in the Turks and Caicos Islands. At the same time, court records and other documents reveal a studied indifference by government prosecutors to Seal's earlier and ongoing operations at Mena.

In the end, the Seal documents are vindication for dedicated officials in Arkansas like agents Duncan and Welch and local citizens' groups like the Arkansas Committee, whose own evidence and charges take on a new gravity — and also for *The Nation*, *The Village Voice*, the Association of National Security Alumni, the venerable Washington journalists Sarah McClendon and Jack Anderson, Arkansas reporters Rodney Bowers and Mara Leveritt, and others who kept an all-too-authentic story alive amid wider indifference.

But now the larger implications of the newly exposed evidence seem as disturbing as the criminal enormity it silhouettes. Like his modern freebooter's life, Seal's documents leave the political and legal landscape littered with stark questions.

What, for example, happened to some nine different official investigations into Mena after 1987, from allegedly compromised federal grand juries to congressional inquiries suppressed by the National Security Council in 1988 under Ronald Reagan to still later Justice Department inaction under George Bush?

Officials repeatedly invoked national security to quash most of the investigations. Court documents *do* show clearly that the CIA and the DEA employed Seal during 1984 and 1985 for the Reagan administration's celebrated sting attempt to implicate the Nicaraguan Sandinista regime in cocaine trafficking.

According to a December 1988 Senate Foreign Relations Committee report, "cases were dropped. The apparent reason was that the prosecution might have revealed national-security information, even though all of the crimes which were the focus of the investigation occurred before Seal became a federal informant."

Tax records show that, having assessed Seal posthumously for some $86 million in back taxes on his earnings from Mena and elsewhere between 1981 and 1983, even the IRS forgave the taxes on hundreds of millions in known drug and gun profits over the ensuing two-year period when Seal was officially admitted to be employed by the government.

To follow the IRS logic, what of the years, crimes, and profits at Mena in the early eighties, before Barry Seal became an acknowledged federal operative, as well as the subsequently reported drug-trafficking activities at Mena even *after* his murder — crimes far removed from his admitted cooperation as government informant and witness?

"Joe [name deleted] works for Seal and cannot be touched because Seal works for the CIA," a Customs official said in an Arkansas investigation into drug trafficking during the early eighties. "A CIA or DEA operation is taking place at the Mena airport," an FBI telex advised the Arkansas State Police in August 1987, 18 months after Seal's murder. Welch later testified that a Customs agent told him, "Look, we've been told not to touch anything that has Barry Seal's name on it, just to let it go."

The London *Sunday Telegraph* recently reported new evidence, including a secret code number, that Seal was also working as an operative of the Defense Intelligence Agency during the period of the gunrunning and drug smuggling.

Perhaps most telling is what is so visibly missing from the voluminous files. In thousands of pages reflecting a man of meticulous organization and planning, Barry Seal seems to have felt singularly and utterly secure — if not somehow invulnerable — at least in the ceaseless air transport and delivery into the United States of tons of cocaine for more than five years. In a 1986 letter to the DEA, the commander and deputy commander of narcotics for the Louisiana State Police say that Seal "was being given apparent free rein to import drugs in conjunction with DEA investigations with so little restraint and control on his actions as to allow him the opportunity to import drugs for himself should he have been so disposed."

Seal's personal videotapes, in the authors' possession, show one scene in which he used U.S. Army paratroop equipment, as well as military-like precision, in his drug-transporting operation. Then, in the middle of the afternoon, after a number of dry runs, one of his airplanes dropped a load of several duffel bags attached to a parachute. Within seconds, the cargo sitting on the remote grass landing strip was retrieved by Seal and loaded onto a helicopter that had followed the low-flying aircraft. "This is the first daylight cocaine drop in the history of the state of Louisiana," Seal narrates on the tape. If the duffel bags seen in the smuggler's home movies were filled with cocaine — as Seal himself states on tape — that single load would have been worth hundreds of millions of dollars.

Perhaps the videos were not of an actual cocaine drop, but merely the drug trafficker's training video for his smuggling organization, or even a test maneuver. Regardless, the films show a remarkable, fearless invincibility. Barry Seal was not expecting apprehension.

His most personal papers show him all but unconcerned about the very flights and drops that would indeed have been protected or "fixed," according to law-enforcement sources, by the collusion of U.S. intelligence.

In an interview with agent Duncan, Seal brazenly "admitted that he had been a drug smuggler."

If the Seal documents show anything, an attentive reader might conclude, it is that ominous implication of some official sanction. Over the entire episode looms the unmistakable shape of government collaboration in vast drug trafficking and gunrunning, and in a decade-long cover-up of criminality.

Government investigators apparently had no doubt about the magnitude of those crimes. According to Customs sources, Seal's operations at Mena and other bases were involved in the export of guns to Bolivia, Argentina, Peru, and Brazil, as well as to the Contras, and the importation of cocaine from Colombia to be sold in New York, Chicago, Detroit, St. Louis, and other cities, as well as in Arkansas itself.

Duncan and his colleagues knew that Seal's modus operandi included dumping most of the drugs in other southern states, so that what Arkansas agents witnessed in Mena was but a tiny fragment of an operation staggering it its magnitude.

Yet none of the putative inquiries seems to have made a serious effort to gather even a fraction of the available Seal documents now assembled and studied by the authors.

Finally, of course, there are somber questions about then governor Clinton's own role vis-a-vis the crimes of Mena.

Clinton has acknowledged learning officially about Mena only in April 1988, though a state police investigation had been in progress for several years. As the state's chief executive, Clinton often claimed to be fully abreast of such inquiries. In his one public statement on the matter as governor, in September 1991, he spoke of that investigation finding "linkages to the federal government," and "all kinds of questions about whether he [Seal] had any links to the CIA... and if that backed into the Iran-Contra deal."

But then Clinton did not offer further support for any inquiry, "despite the fact," as Bill Plante and Michael Singer of CBS News have written, "that a Republican administration was apparently sponsoring a Contra-aid operation in his state and protecting a smuggling ring that flew tons of cocaine through Arkansas."

As recently as March 1995, Arkansas state trooper Larry Patterson testified under oath, according to the London *Sunday Telegraph*, that he and other officers "discussed repeatedly in Clinton's presence" the "large quantities of drugs being flown into the Mena airport, large quantities of money, large quantities of guns," indicating that Clinton may have known much more about Seal's activities than he has admitted.

Moreover, what of the hundreds of millions generated by Seal's Mena contraband? The Seal records reveal his dealings with at least one major Little Rock bank. How much drug money from him or his associates made its way into criminal laundering in Arkansas's notoriously freewheeling financial institutions and bond houses, some of which are reportedly under investigation by the Whitewater special prosecutor for just such large, unaccountable infusions of cash and unexplained transactions?

"The state offers an enticing climate for traffickers," IRS agents had concluded by the end of the eighties, documenting a "major increase" in the amount of large cash and bank transactions in Arkansas after 1985, despite a struggling local economy.

Meanwhile, prominent backers of Clinton's over the same years — including bond broker and convicted drug dealer Dan Lasater and chicken tycoon Don Tyson — have themselves been subjects of extensive investigative and surveillance files by the DEA or the FBI similar to those relating to Seal, including allegations of illegal drug activity that Tyson has recently acknowledged publicly and denounced as "totally false." "This may be the first president in history with such close buddies who have NADDIS numbers" says one concerned law-enforcement official, referring to the Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs Intelligence System numbers assigned those under protracted investigation for possible drug crimes.

The Seal documents are still more proof that Clinton, the Arkansas of the eighties and the company that he kept there will not soon disappear as a political or even constitutional liability.

"I've always felt we never got the whole story there," Clinton said in 1991.

Indeed. But as president of the United States, he need no longer wonder — and neither should the nation. On the basis of the Seal documents (copies of which are being given to the Whitewater special prosecutor in any case), the president should ask immediately for a full report on the matter from the CIA, the DEA, the FBI, the Justice Department, and other relevant agencies of his own administration — including the long-buried evidence gathered by IRS agent Duncan and Arkansas state police investigator Welch. President Clinton should also offer full executive-branch cooperation with a reopened congressional inquiry, and expose the subject fully for what it says of both the American past and future.

Seal saw himself as a patriot to the end. He had dictated his own epitaph for his grave in Baton Rouge: "A rebel adventurer the likes of whom in previous days made America great." In a sense, his documents may now render that claim less ironic than it seems.

The tons of drugs that Seal and his associates brought into the country, officials agree, affected tens of thousands of lives at the least, and exacted an incalculable toll on American society. And for the three presidents, the enduring questions of political scandal are once again apt: What did they know about Mena? When did they now it? Why didn't they do anything to stop it?

The crimes of Mena were real. That much is now documented beyond doubt. The only remaining issues are how far they extended, and who was responsible.

~END ~

----- End Included Message -----

------------------------------------------

Date: Sun Aug 27, 1995 7:26 pm CST
From: Richard Clark
                 EMS: INTERNET / MCI ID: 376-5414
                 MBX: cardin@slip.net

TO: * David Beiter / MCI ID: 635-1762
Subject: Re: A review of the Mena coke operation

The secretaries employed at the Mena airport have testified that when Barry Seal flew into Mena "there would be stacks of cash to be taken to the bank and laundered." One secretary told IRS investigator Bill Duncan that she was ordered to obtain numerous cashier's checks, each in an amount just under $10,000, at various banks around Mena. Why? — So that federal Currency Transaction Reports would not have to be filed. Bank tellers testified before a federal grand jury about an instance when a Mena airport employee carried a suitcase into their bank that was stuffed with $70,000 in cash. The bank officer calmly proceeded from one teller to the next, handing out stacks of hundred dollar bills to each one, so that the proper cashier's checks could be drawn up without delay. (The best customers get the best service.)

Between 1981 and 1983, hundreds of thousands of dollars were in this way laundered just in the few small banks near Mena, according to law- enforcement sources. Millions more were laundered throughout Arkansas. [According to other sources there is also evidence that then-governor Clinton was able to siphon off some of these proceeds, putting them to use in the purchase of political advantage not otherwise available. Apparently much of Arkansas was benefiting from this operation, especially the Arkansas Development Finance Authority (AFDA), which helped launder (and disburse) much of the money. Political payoffs were rampant.] Of special interest here, to the Whitewater special prosecutor, were the huge and completely unaccountable infusions of cash into various Arkansas financial institutions. IRS records show a "major increase" in the amount of large cash and bank transactions in Arkansas around this period, despite a rather poor and struggling local economy. It would seem that unless the Whitewater investigation is somehow corrupted or stopped, some very upsetting truth is likely to emerge. Note: many of the recently unearthed Barry Seal documents have been forwarded to the Whitewater special prosecutor because they are believed to have great relevance to that investigation.

What happened to the nine different investigations into Mena after 1987? Mainly it was a matter of compromised federal grand juries and congressional inquiries that were suppressed by the National Security Council under Ronald Reagan's directives. Then there was Justice Department sand-bagging under George Bush. The whole story had to be quashed for reasons of "national security." It seems that Reagan, Bush and Clinton can't imagine a nation in which the truth about this would come out. Why? Perhaps because it would be a nation in which they would be in jail.

Curiously, as governor of Arkansas in 1991, Clinton publicly acknowledged that the Mena investigation had found "linkages to the federal government," and had come up with "all kinds of questions about whether he [Barry Seal] had any links to the CIA" and about whether or not this was tied into "the Iran-Contra deal." But then Clinton apparently decided it would not be to his advantage to press for any further inquiry. Meanwhile his principal political backers in Arkansas are under FBI investigation and have been assigned case numbers under the Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs Intelligence System.

Clinton's failure, as governor, to press for an investigation of this is mighty strange, according to Bill Plante and Michael Singer of CBS News. They write that "a Republican administration was apparently sponsoring a Contra-aid operation in his state and protecting a smuggling ring that flew tons of cocaine through Arkansas."

Now, for the time being, one can only speculate as to why _president_ Bill, now that he has the power, does not immediately ask for a full report from the CIA, IRS, DEA, and FBI about their rather abundant and long-suppressed records having to do with the Mena operation. Why must the cover-up continue, Bill? Why not bring the whole truth out into the open? Could the answer to this question possibly have something to do with the tens of thousands of lives that have been destroyed by these tons of coke that were flown into Arkansas? Could it possibly have something to do with the tens of thousands of young black men whose souls rot in the proliferating numbers of penitentiaries that have had to be constructed to house them all? Worst of all, could these be the people who unwittingly made it possible for Bill Clinton to become president?

Richard Clark

------------------------------------------

Date: Sun Aug 27, 1995 7:28 pm CST
From: Randy Benes
                 EMS: INTERNET / MCI ID: 376-5414
                 MBX: DFFC45B@prodigy.com

TO: * David Beiter / MCI ID: 635-1762
Subject: Impending Crisis Over Whitewater

IMPENDING CRISIS OVER WHITEWATER
by Paul Craig Roberts

The liberal media and Moderate Republicans are trying to psych-out Gingrich and Company in order to prevent any fundamental changes. The argument is that if the Republicans go too far, President Clinton will veto their measures. It is better, say the liberals and the moderates, to compromise in behalf of limited change in place or none at all.

The truth is the opposite. If Mr. Clinton cooperates with the Republican agenda, he may be spared Whitewatergate impeachment. There is no question that Mr. Clinton is at least as vulnerable as was Mr. Nixon. Sen. Alfonse D'Amato, chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, could easily drive Mr. Clinton from office with Whitewater hearings. Indeed, many people believe that the only thing that will keep Mr. Clinton from being indicted is that he is more valuable to Republicans in office.

One often hears in Republican circles that "Jimmy Carter gave us Reagan, and Clinton gave us a Republican Congress. Clinton is destroying the Democratic Party. Why do we want to evict him?"

Keeping Mr. Clinton in office might not be a bad strategy, but the problem for Republicans is that Whitewater may be too explosive for them to sit on. Serious discrepancies between the testimony of eyewitnesses and the official report on Deputy White Counsel Vincent Foster's death have forced Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr to reopen the inquiry.

Two rescue workers, George Gonzalez and Todd Hall, summoned to Fort Marcy Park when Mr. Foster's body was discovered have told authorities that they saw Mr. Foster's briefcase in his car in the Fort Marcy parking lot. This is big trouble for the official report that places the briefcase in Mr. Foster's White House office with a torn-up suicide note.

This discrepancy gives new weight to the witness who found Mr. Foster's body and has testified under oath that no gun or weapon was present on the scene. Something is seriously amiss when the official report is so totally at odds at crucial points with eyewitness accounts.

Whitewater is proving explosive for another reason as well. It is increasingly pointing to Mena, Ark., the site of gun-running and drug-smuggling operations in the 1980s. A former Air Force intelligence officer has published a book charging that Clinton friends laundered drug money through the Arkansas Development Finance Authority, a state agency under Gov. Clinton's direct control.

Whatever was going on in Mena was big enough that powerful interests in both political parties are determined to keep the lid on. Rep. Bill Alexander, who represented Arkansas for 24 years in the House, was unable to get anywhere with his efforts to investigate Mena. "There was enough evidence to begin cracking it open," says Mr. Alexander, " and suddenly nobody wanted to touch it. I want to know why. "

Mr. Alexander notes that despite having "the highest possible clearance that the government can provide for secrecy," he was "denied access to information in a criminal investigation in my own state."

Bill Duncan and Russell Welch, respectively Internal Revenue Service and Arkansas State Police investigators, marshaled evidence of money-laundering connected to the Mena activities and managed to get a case before a federal grand jury, but it was botched. Several grand jurors complained of "some type of government intervention" that resulted in a cover-up.

The book by the former Air Force intelligence officer drags so many prominent names through the mire that it almost looks like an attempt to convince the public that Mena is nothing but a wild conspiracy theory. An excess of kooky charges is one way to kill an investigation.

If Mena proves to be about anything, I predict it will be a story of the corruption of U.S. politics by drug money. Recently Hernan Cubillos, former foreign minister of Chile, wrote in the Wall Street Journal that "armies that fight drug traffickers become corrupted by them." He notes that "by pushing Latin America's armies into a war on drugs" the United States has caused two South American countries to "have parallel government financed by drug money."

Mr. Cubillos says there are only two solutions to the drug problem, drastic Singapore-style punishments or legalization. "Either would destroy the drug lords. What the U.S. is now doing empowers them."

The best way to avoid a political crisis when the Mena story finally breaks is for Gingrich and Company to have already pulled off a political revolution in Washington.

Paul Craig Roberts is a columnist for the Washington Times and is nationally syndicated.

------------------------------------------

Date: Sun Aug 27, 1995 6:33 pm CST
From: Martin Anderson
                 EMS: INTERNET / MCI ID: 376-5414
                 MBX: anderso1@ix.netcom.com

TO: * David Beiter / MCI ID: 635-1762
Subject: Fwd: Re: Clinton/Bush: Co-conspirators in CIA Drug Smuggling (part 4 of 5)

---- Begin Forwarded Message

220 14023 <41qi6f$q40@ixnews4.ix.netcom.com> article
Path: ix.netcom.com!netnews
From: anderso1@ix.netcom.com (Martin Anderson )
Newsgroups: alt.current-events.clinton.whitewater
Subject: Re: Clinton/Bush: Co-conspirators in CIA Drug Smuggling (part 4 of 5)
Date: 27 Aug 1995 19:48:31 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <41qi6f$q40@ixnews4.ix.netcom.com>
References: <41ps1t$284@news.cais.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-dc14-04.ix.netcom.com

In <41ps1t$284@news.cais.com nemo writes:

From: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------.

But in any case, we've collected just about everything that's publicly available about Mena and all of its ramifications. It's a tremendous story, and I'd like to emphasize, right now, that Governor Clinton's part in this is very minor. The real big fish in this story is President George Bush.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

This, folks, is what is called a trial balloon.

Its place of birth is the Oval Office and its genesis was not immaculate.

The Mena heat is building up, Senator Dole notwithstanding, and a fallback position is being constructed.

This will be only the latest version of the ongoing "it wasn't my fault" footnoting of Clintonista history.

That should be obvious to all save the average Republican Senator who, of course, will again be blindsided.

Martin

---- End Forwarded Message