The J6 Inquisition

The False Accusations to Persecute Patriots

On August 2, 2023, the MG Show, starring InTheMatrixxx and ShadyGrooove, highlighted a narrative surrounding the "January 6th Insurrection." The MG Show included a video series created by Wooz News. An interview was given to this video series creator, known as Wooz News. And a witch hunt was born.

I am going to include clips from this series with transcripts of those clips. However, the full video and interview can be found here.

MG Show: A Conversation with Wooz News (August 2, 2023)

The Kay-Fab Conspiracy

Where did this January 6th footage come from? The below is a clip explaining the origins of the footage and the research that went into it. The answer given by Wooz News is it allegedly came from various social media posts and ProPublica.

When you listen to this segment, one thing is clear which we all can agree on. There was video which was staged. The Mainstream Media was set up to film a production. Even if you don't read all the news stories about agents and provocateurs being embedded in the crowd at January 6th, for the media to be set up like this is suspect. I will discuss why shortly.

Transcript from the video:

InTheMatrixxx: So you've combed through all of this footage. Did you use the footage from ProPublica? Cause they stole all of the footage from Parlor and had it all nicely with times and everything. I don't know if you have seen it. But they had it timestamps. Inside. Outside the Capitol.

Wooz News: Of course!

InTheMatrixxx: Okay.

Wooz News: How do you think I was able to connect all of this together? With the timestamps.

InTheMatrixxx: Oh man! You were the one that I was praying for. Because I saw that ProPublica stole that.

Wooz News: Thank God that they stole it. I don't really care if they stole it or not. I got the footage.

InTheMatrixxx: Well a hacker hacked it and they got it somehow.

Wooz News: That's the story. It was extremely helpful. I used the Parler footage. I used footage from Facebook. I used footage from Twitter. YouTube. I mean... research is my game. I see a clip and I see its low quality. I will spend a week... I will spend a week looking for that clip again.

InTheMatrixxx: Wow. And to make it better or get a better quality. We have a ... Your character in the Everything Wrong With Capitol Riots in 898 Angles Act 2. Your character, Q, is actually a friend of ours. We actually had some questions about him because he was right there in the front. He was being filmed by somebody that we know as well that hasn't been arrested or anything. And we just ask questions yesterday. And the connections to this person is actually kind of questionable. So what is your take on the character named Q in your video?

Wooz News: I would say Q has a very small part in Act 2. I think we may see him once in Act 3. I have my key characters, which I won't reveal just yet because it all comes together in Act 3. But you can start to see who are my central characters in this story.

InTheMatrixxx: So the media... The media people... They had them all there an hour before to get these incredible shots. They had water. They had boards. Plans. Props. You know. It was absolutely a Hollywood production. We were watching a movie. Literally.

Wooz News: Yes. It makes you wonder why Trump's speech was late by an hour.

InTheMatrixxx: Yeah. That's interesting.

ShadyGrooove: It really was interesting to see the dynamic of what occurred because the way that they put it out in the media was acting as if all these people came over there after the speech was finished. A lot of people don't realize that it was delayed a little over an hour. A bunch of the video footage that you put in the Act 2 was from before he finished talking. Was that correct?

Wooz News: That is correct. The Kay-Fab show was... The Kay-Fab show was full speed ahead by the time he finished which was about 1:09 PM to 1:14 PM. In there you have the YMCA song and him dancing for 3 whole minutes. So 1:14. It's a 30 to 40 minute walk to the Capitol. So if folks are there at the Capitol and their intention was to see Trump on January 6th, why aren't you at the Ellipse? Why are you Kay-Fabbing.

Hacking Parler

Parler was a social media app that you don't hear about too much these days. There is a reason for that. It launched in August of 2018 and promoted itself as an unbiased and free speech social media platform that was an alternative to Twitter and Facebook. It started gaining in popularity as more and more conservative voices were censored from the larger social media platforms.

Then in 2020, several of President Trump's tweets were flagged by Twitter, while he was still President of the United States. It was about this time that accounts were starting to get banned from Twitter and I presume Facebook. This happened sporadically at first and then with more frequency until the Great Twitter Purge, when hundreds of thousands of conservative voices were banned permanently off of Twitter on January 8, 2021. Social media sites, like Parler, Gab, and Telegram, became a home to some of those voices.

This wasn't just a United States phenomena. Conservative voices all around the world, including Jair Bolsonaro, the President of Brazil, were being censored and forced to move to alternative sources. It wasn't just single posts that were being forced to be deleted. Whole accounts were being wiped out at the push of a button from these tech giants.

This led to some issues. For instance, Parler had a couple security weaknesses that ended up being exploited.

Online tricksters have already found ways to wreak havoc with the site’s own tools. Parler gives a “verified” badge to users who confirm their identity by submitting photos of an official ID card and a video of themselves slowly blinking their eyes, but the site doesn’t prevent those users from then changing their name — a major security oversight that has been used to impersonate more than a dozen people, including Republican members of Congress.

A Washington Post reporter two weekends ago Nov. 14 alerted Parler to a potential impostor account that purported to reveal the identity of the mysterious Q, whose “drops” drive the QAnon conspiracy movement. Executives said they were investigating the issue, but have not responded, even as the hoax continued to spread online. Aubrey Cottle, a security researcher and co-founder of the Anonymous hacker collective, later told The Post he was behind the prank, saying the site’s security is a “joke” and that he “did it for the lulz” — the laughs.

Internet Archive: Washington Post: Conservatives grumbling about censorship say they’re flocking to Parler. They told us so on Twitter.

More specifically, Aubrey Cottle, who was allegedly a member of the hacktivist group called Anonymous, changed his verified account to look like it was a verified account for Ron Watkins, the former site administer of 8chan and son of 8chan owner Jim Watkins. On November 15, 2020, the fake "Ron Watkins verified account" made several posts which allegedly confirmed a conspiracy theory that his father Jim Watkins was Q, the anonymous account behind the Q posts. This led to a huge feud between Dan Bongino, a Parler investor, and Jim Watkins. This story was picked up by and used as ammo against conservatives and Parler in two articles written by Daily Dot, which ended up adding fuel to the fire.

Daily Dot: Why 8kun’s Former Admin Is At War With Right-Wing Star Dan Bongino

Daily Dot: There’s No Evidence Parler Was Hacked, Despite Viral Claims

Then, the event on January 6, 2021 at the Capitol in Washington, D.C. took place. It was reported that conservatives were using sites like Parler to call for violence during the event. I will get into why these reports by the Mainstream Media are problematic and misrepresented what happened. But for now, just know that this is what was being reported and the truth was largely ignored by every news outlet and censored off of every major social media platform.

Far-right online forums are seething with references to potential violence and urging supporters of President Trump to bring guns to Wednesday’s protests in Washington — in violation of local laws — as Congress meets to certify President-elect Joe Biden’s victory.

Many of the posts appear to be direct responses to Trump’s demands that his supporters pack the nation’s capital in support of his bogus claims that November’s national vote for Biden resulted from election fraud. Congress’s largely ceremonial role in confirming Biden’s victory has emerged as a catalyst for expected unrest that has D.C. police and the National Guard deploying on city streets to quell potential trouble.

Talk of guns and potential violence is rife on the encrypted messaging app Telegram, the conservative social media site Parler and on thedonald.win, an online forum that previously operated on Reddit before the company banned it in June after years of racism, misogyny, anti-Semitism and calls for violence.

Internet Archive: Washington Post: Pro-Trump Forums Erupt With Violent Threats Ahead Of Wednesday’s Rally Against The 2020 Election

On January 8, 2021, hundreds of thousands of Twitter users lost their accounts. Google pulled Parler from the Google Play Store. Parler became the top downloaded app in the Apple App Store on the same day. The next day, on January 9, 2021, Parler was removed from the Apple App Store. Amazon also suspended Parler from its Amazon Web Services. This effectively took Parler down as a social media platform.

Sometime between the "Insurrection at the Capitol" and before it went down on January 9, 8 terabytes of data was scraped off of Parler. This data included posts, GPS metadata, GPS coordinates, and video of its users.

In the wake of the violent insurrection at the U.S. Capitol by scores of President Trump’s supporters, a lone researcher began an effort to catalogue the posts of social media users across Parler, a platform founded to provide conservative users a safe haven for uninhibited “free speech” — but which ultimately devolved into a hotbed of far-right conspiracy theories, unchecked racism, and death threats aimed at prominent politicians.

The researcher, who asked to be referred to by her Twitter handle, @donk_enby, began with the goal of archiving every post from January 6, the day of the Capitol riot; what she called a bevy of “very incriminating” evidence. According to the Atlantic Council’s Digital Forensic Research Lab, among other sources, Parler is one of a several apps used by the insurrections to coordinate their breach of the Capitol, in a plan to overturn the 2020 election results and keep Donald Trump in power.

Internet Archive: Gizmodo: Every Deleted Parler Post, Many With Users' Location Data, Has Been Archived

This data has been used to target conservative voices, regardless of what they posted or their political ideation. So who did they target? Police officers. Law enforcement and military service members.

Location data gleaned from thousands of videos posted on the social network Parler and extracted in the days before Amazon restricted access to app this week, reveal its users included police officers around the U.S. and service members stationed on bases at home and abroad.

The presence on Parler of active military and police raises concerns, experts said, about their potential exposure to far-right conspiracy theories and extremist ideologies enabled by the platform’s practically nonexistent moderation and its stated openness to hate speech. Military officials have long considered infiltration and recruitment by white supremacist groups a threat. Groups that endorsed a wide range of racist beliefs appear to have been operating openly on Parler, the experts said, with the de facto permission of its owners. The FBI has likewise raised concerns over law enforcement agents adopting radical views and recruited—viewing their access to secured buildings, elected officials, and other VIPs as a singular threat.

Internet Archive: Gizmodo: Leaked Parler Data Points to Users at Police Stations, U.S. Military Bases

As a result, on January 29, 2021, Parler's board of directors dismissed John Matze as its CEO.

On February 15, 2021, Parler came back online for existing users. There was one issue with it though. All the original data and information posted by those users was gone. A limited version of Parler became available through the Apple App Store on May 17, 2021. Parler wouldn't be available again via the Google Play Store until September 2, 2022.

On October 17, 2022, Kanye West's bid to buy Parler was accepted. It was a closed deal shortly after. In celebration of this decision, Parler sent an email announcing the acquisition and subsequently doxxed over 300 of its VIP members.

The social media platform Parler accidentally leaked the personal email addresses of its own VIPs, including Ivanka Trump and Kimberly Guilfoyle.

The Parler outreach team emailed over 200 verified users Monday to announce a deal its parent company made with Kanye West to take over the platform. The deal with the rapper, who had recently been banned from Instagram and Twitter for anti-Semitic posts, is expected to be completed later this year.

But in sharing the news with its esteemed users, Parler neglected to protect their private information. The platform doxxed user emails by adding them to the email in the carbon copy function instead of blind carbon copy.

New York Post: Parler Accidentally Doxxes VIPs Like Ivanka Trump, Kimberly Guilfoyle In Kanye West Buyout Announcement

Parler's chapter finally closed on April 14, 2023. An Arlington, Virginia-based digital media conglomerate named Starboard acquired the parent company for Parler.

Digital media conglomerate Starboard said on Friday it has bought Parler for an undisclosed sum and will temporarily shut down the social media app popular with U.S. conservatives to give itself time to roll out a revamped version of the platform.

The move comes months after the collapse of a deal that would have seen American rapper Kanye West, who now goes by Ye, buy the platform's parent company Parlement Technologies.

Starboard, formerly Olympic Media, founded in 2018 houses conservative-leaning platforms American Wire and BizPac Review. It plans, opens new tab to service "unsupported online communities" and build a home for them "away from the ad-hoc regulatory hand of platforms that hate them."

Reuters: Conglomerate Starboard Buys Parler, To Shut Down Social Media App Temporarily

Parler was subsequently shutdown after the acquisition. The webpage only has a placeholder.

The website for the company Starboard is equally as sparse.

Ryan Coyne, the new CEO of Parler and founder of Starboard made this statement:

Last week, the right-wing social network Parler was sold to a media conglomerate called Starboard. The company shut Parler down indefinitely to “undergo a strategic assessment.” It marks the end of a long and tumultuous saga for the conservative social media company—once seen as a refuge from mainstream apps like Twitter—including a botched deal with the Nazi sympathizer formerly known as Kanye West, ties to domestic terrorism, and temporary banishment from the app stores. In a conversation with Gizmodo, Starboard CEO Ryan Coyne said Parler’s future is uncertain, but one thing is clear: politics isn’t his priority.

“No reasonable person believes that a Twitter clone for conservatives is a viable business model,” Coyne said.

Gizmodo: Parler’s New Owner Is in It for the Money, Not the Politics

With all the attempts to censor and shutdown conservative voices, what are they trying to hide? If conservatives were calling for violence, why are there no real examples of the biggest voices in our movement making these posts? There should be an overwhelming mountain of evidence showing this. Or could they have been trying to silence the conservative voices who were trying to sound an alarm?

"January 6th was a setup!"

Brian Gamble

Brian Gamble is a respected member of the conservative community. Having had several conversations with him, I will admit I make this statement with a bit of bias. Taking my bias out of it, Brian Gamble is a navy veteran with experience in intelligence analysis and a technology background. He has used his experience to fight for free speech as the founder of the Red Pill Road Show and to expose illegal activities. Recently this has taken the form of becoming a member of America’s Future Project Defend & Protect Our Children Advisory Board.

This is his biography from an upcoming "End Child Trafficking Exploitation and Trafficking" summit and training session being held in Illinois.

Brian Gamble is an accomplished data sciences professional and tech visionary with over three decades of experience in the industry. Throughout his distinguished career, Brian has left indelible marks across diverse sectors, holding pivotal positions, including the role of Chief Information Officer for a prominent Fortune 500 enterprise.

Early in his career, Brian served as an intelligence analyst in the United States Navy during his deployment to the war in the former Yugoslavia. This experience wielded a transformative impact on Brian, charting his lifelong course to shed light on the techniques employed by deep state actors to manipulate the behaviors and cognitions of his fellow countrymen.

For years since leaving the military, Brian balanced his role as a corporate leader, employing technology to confront global challenges during the day while discretely fostering awareness regarding deep state activities online by night.

This rhythm was disrupted when Brian noticed the rapid rise of online censorship. To combat this threat, in 2019, Brian founded a free-speech organization to give a voice to those silenced by big tech. He embarked on a nationwide journey, raising awareness about the growing dangers posed by emerging technologies and the influence of big tech on free speech.

Driven by his passion for exposing the evolving technocracy in the United States, Brian eventually completely transitioned away from the corporate world, which he viewed as increasingly hostile towards his traditional American values.

Brian now supports organizations dedicated to uncovering and exposing illegal activities within national institutions, striving to safeguard the principles of justice and transparency. He is a member of America’s Future Project Defend & Protect Our Children Advisory Board.

America's Future: Get in the Fight Illinois Campaign

Needless to say and according to his biography, Brian Gamble fights against bad actors and illegal activities. Before we talk about the next clip from the MG Show, I want you to read a quote he gave for this article regarding the MG Show.

We will talk about that video that was produced by Brian Gamble later on.

The Inquisition

This second clip highlights the accusations being made against Brian Gamble by InTheMatrixxx and ShadyGrooove from the MG Show in their interview with Wooz News.

Transcript from the video:

InTheMatrixxx: So then we go here. This is his YouTube. Headed to DC. He did a video saying where he was going. Here he is here inside the Capitol. The Gamble character did not go into the Capitol. And they cropped photos. So you couldn't see him in here. But they do... He's smoking a joint in the Capitol.

Wooz News: They all did that.

InTheMatrixxx: Yeah. There's area closed. This is him right here. This is your character Q. And there it is there. Walking in. This is Barrier 1 if I am correct. Here he is leaning on the barrier. And then if you look at right here, Brian Gamble's hat is right here. And he's the one filming Q. So he stayed with him all the way up to the front. Here he is here. Again. And this is from his court papers. This is him pushing the barrier in. And here's Gamble, right here, filming him doing it. There he is there. We don't see Gamble. He's standing up here. I'm just, you know, questioning. There he is there. There he is here. And he's waving people in.

Wooz News: What's your question?

InTheMatrixxx: If your there early, why are people there that early? Like Gamble.

Wooz News: To get paid. To get paid. Or they have a sentence. Or they want something to go away. You know.

ShadyGrooove: Right.

Wooz News: Like a charge. You see that quite often. Money. A lesser sentence for a charge they have been convicted of. Fifteen minutes of fame. Mostly money. An adventure.

InTheMatrixxx: An adventure... And its tied to somebody that we know in this movement named General Flynn. That's the only thing why this could be done separate. I got to put the full context out there. We don't know what is going on, guys. We just know that somebody that's tied to... and now apparently that Brian Gamble is working for James O'Keefe I hear, which was also your star.

Wooz News: Oh. Well, he's a star in Act 2. We won't see him in Act 3. I mean, he wasn't at the Capitol or anything. That was my "alternative" news segment. Like I said, everyone's a suspect.

InTheMatrixxx: Yeah. Yeah. All we do is have questions. That's all we have. And that's all you have, right? I guess Shady and I have this motto. A fact is a fact whether we like it or not. It is a fact that Brian Gamble was filming your Q character and our friend and waving him on and all that. Obstacle number 1, he was right there. Who brought him there? Well, you know who brought him there now. Pretty crazy.

Wooz News: He brought himself there.

InTheMatrixxx: Yeah. Wow.

 I mean that was his intention.

Wooz News: InTheMatrixxx: Yeah.

Wooz News: You know what I mean. Oh we are all just going to leave Trump's speech before he starts speaking. Come on. It's so obvious that they are acting as well.

ShadyGrooove: Well and also... The infrastructure... the infrastructure was set up, you know. A lot of the video I feel like you were showing was showing that the media were already in their pre-determined spots. I noticed that you pointed out a number of markings on the ground. They were showing "you stand here." This is exactly how you would organize a stage set if you were doing a play on stage. The floor is constantly... you got all these different markers of where you are supposed to be on the floor. And so pointing that out was very interesting because all of the journalists. It seemed like to me... I don't know... But it kind of seems like they kept gravitating back to the same areas and then setting the shots up in front of them. And then they are all there to get the shot right away. And then the scene changes and then they're setting up another scene like to the left or to the right. It's seamless in the sense that they are going from shot to shot to shot of, in particular, Kay-Fab they are doing out in front of the cameras.

Wooz News: Yeah. So when your audience watches this footage, over the last 2 years, they just see mayhem. They just see chaos. Slow it down. Are you looking at all the photographers that are in the background? You know. They've cut the shot and spliced them together. You know. All that Hollywood magic. But as far as our big boys, like CNN and Fox News and what not, they are on the East side of the Capitol.

InTheMatrixxx: They are on the other side. Interesting. I got another clip to play for you just to get your take on it. We are going to call it Woodland Norris. That is who the... I don't know if you saw this. But this is right here. Purple meathead, that is a Hilbert. Uhhhh... Then we got this guy.

Wooz News: Okay.

InTheMatrixxx: Is that not acting?

Wooz News: Of course it is.

InTheMatrixxx: That's acting and part of an op.

Wooz News: This is obstacle 1. This is obstacle 1 East Side.

InTheMatrixxx: Okay. That person Woodland Norris wrote a book with General Flynn called 5G Warfare.

Wooz News: And who wrote out the 5G Operation? You tell me. What is that? March 27?

InTheMatrixxx: Yeah.

Wooz News: 5G Data Broadband Protection Act

InTheMatrixxx: Yeah. Well that's... Yeah. Is it 5GW Warfare? I can't remember exactly what the book was. But that is the co-author with General Flynn on the book using psyops and how to detect psyops. It's just interesting guys. I am just asking questions. You guys be the judge. This is before Trump started speaking and here they are Obstacle 1. You guys make the decision. Because these are people in our movement, Rafa. You see what I'm saying.

Wooz News: Oh yeah they are. They make up most of your movement.

InTheMatrixxx: Yeah.

I don't see a whole lot of questions being asked by the MG Show. I do see a lot of accusations being passed around. In fact, the only real question I see being asked is why was Brian Gamble there early? For all the research these three did, did they bother going to the source to ask? Did they lookup the video that was produced that day? And where did they get the name Obstacle 1? Was that a formal designation?

Well, I may not have the answers to all these questions. However, the first question I can answer definitively from the quote Brian Gamble gave me. Here it is again as a reminder.

As far as the video produced, I can provide that as well. It paints a very different picture than what is being shown on the MG Show. Here is a link to the video posted by i70Tim on X (formerly known as Twitter).

Just Asking Questions

Why would Brian Gamble be questioning the J6 narrative? Maybe because he saw the same posts many conservatives prior to January 6, 2021 and were censored for pointing out. His video certainly calls the official narrative into question.

So what exactly was it that we saw that had to be silenced? Why did Parler have to get shutdown? What did we see that caused us to sound the alarm?

Could it have been this?

These posts don't make a whole lot of sense... until you listen to the MG Show interview with Wooz News once again. I am not going to make you listen to the clip again, but I am going to quote a segment from it.

Wooz News: Yeah. So when your audience watches this footage, over the last 2 years, they just see mayhem. They just see chaos. Slow it down. Are you looking at all the photographers that are in the background? You know. They've cut the shot and spliced them together. You know. All that Hollywood magic. But as far as our big boys, like CNN and Fox News and what not, they are on the East side of the Capitol.

"All the big boys, like CNN and Fox News, were on the East side of the Capitol."

And from the top post in that screenshot, "1831 is where it's at Surveillance teams check in w/ your team leaders. NJPZCB7Z".

1831... Could they have been referring to 1831 Constitution Avenue in Washington, D.C. which is located on the East side of the Capitol and located at the United Methodist Building?

The above screenshot was hardly the only screenshot that was saved.

From the top post in this particular screenshot:

If Parler goes away I swear to god I will buy the entire team an extra bottle. Our prayers to satan have been answered.

Seriously make sure you have access to the Twitter and Reddit and discord channels. This one was for the lols anyway. Fuck these guys.

antifa wins again!

SSHDQ2W3

From the bottom post in this particular screenshot:

Some info on the discord about the 17th and 20th for those who don't check it. Btw, we are splash 73. Media reps are missing several of the gun cha... No 1 [No one] expects pardons. I personally think it'll be a good thing. We'll talk options then.

Actually, we have so many of these screenshots that a video montage was made of them by UncleManny on X (formerly known as Twitter).

Entrapment: Who Was In The Crowd?

Who was in the crowd at the Capitol during January 6, 2021? That's a good question. Well, we know it wasn't conservatives trying to overthrow a government or cause an insurrection.

The FBI has found scant evidence that the Jan. 6 attack, opens new tab on the U.S. Capitol was the result of an organized plot to overturn the presidential election result, according to four current and former law enforcement officials.

Though federal officials have arrested more than 570 alleged participants, the FBI at this point believes the violence was not centrally coordinated by far-right groups or prominent supporters, opens new tab of then-President Donald Trump, opens new tab, according to the sources, who have been either directly involved in or briefed regularly on the wide-ranging investigations.

"Ninety to ninety-five percent of these are one-off cases," said a former senior law enforcement official with knowledge of the investigation. "Then you have five percent, maybe, of these militia groups that were more closely organized. But there was no grand scheme with Roger Stone and Alex Jones and all of these people to storm the Capitol and take hostages."

Reuters: Exclusive: FBI Finds Scant Evidence U.S. Capitol Attack Was Coordinated - Sources

But if you listened to the MG Show podcast on August 2, 2023 and watching the Wooz News videos, they never bring articles like this up. They also don't mention US Representative Clay Higgins statements or the testimony given by FBI Director Christopher Wray to Congress.

U.S. Rep. Clay Higgins claims that there were “at least 200” undercover federal agents embedded in the crowd during the January 6 Capitol riot, some of whom were “dressed as Trump supporters” and inside the Capitol before it was breached.

He suggested that the FBI’s involvement was deep, not just on January 6, but in the days and weeks prior.

FBI officials have not disclosed how many agents were embedded in the crowd, and FBI Director Christopher Wray did not deny the claim but testified that no FBI agents were involved in “the violence at the Capitol” on January 6. (Trending: Disgraced Democrat Sued For Sexual Assault)

“The FBI was not only involved in the actions on January 6th from within. They had, I suspect, over 200 agents embedded within the crowd, including agents or, as they would call it, human assets inside the Capitol dressed as Trump supporters before the doors were opened,” Higgins said.

“And when you track the text threads and the communications within those groups and find the origins of suggestions of potential violence or an active occupation of the Capitol on January 6th, you’ll find that those messages were led by members of the groups that ended up to be the FBI agents that had infiltrated the group,” Higgins added.

MSN: Congressman Says There Were ‘At Least 200’ Undercover Agents Embedded On Jan 6

Do you mean messages like the ones shown above and the ones in the video which uses codes like "SSHDQ2W3?" Huh.

On January 6, 2023, US Representative Clay Higgins was interviewed by Tucker Carlson about his statements. You can watch the full video here on X (formerly known as Twitter).

Transcript of the interview:

US Rep Clay Higgins: When I asked Christopher Wray that question, for instance, I already knew the answer. I reviewed compelling evidence that the FBI had assets, human assets, dressed as Trump supporters inside the Capitol prior to the doors being opened and the masses allowed in. So, I knew that the FBI was deeply involved. I had seen evidence, even at that time, with the FBI had embedded themselves into various groups online across the country.

Tucker Carlson: When you say that there were FBI assets in the crowd, in the building beforehand and certainly outside, what's the scale of this? Are you talking like 10? 20?

US Rep Clay Higgins: Nah. The bottom line is that 200 I believe is a conservative number. Personally I think there was many more. But a number that I am comfortable going on record with is that we believe that there was easily 200 undercover assets operating in the crowd, outside the Capitol, and embedded into groups that entered the Capitol or provoked entry into the Capitol and working with FBI assets that would have included metro police and Capitol police that would dress as Trump supporters inside the Capitol because those were the guys who knew their way around the Capitol. So given the scope of the operation and the number of doors where entry was allowed or even encouraged and the number of people who were actually outside the Capitol and that entered, we believe 200 is a conservative number. Yes, sir.

US Rep Clay Higgins: When you dig into the evidence that we've had revealed through some criminal cases that I've followed and worked with. Families of J6. Political detainees. Americans that have been persecuted for their involvement in the Capitol that day. Some of that evidence is shockingly reveals that the FBI agents that were operating undercover within the online groups across the country were the first ones to plant the seeds of suggestions of a more radical occupation of the Capitol.

US Rep Clay Higgins: Americans gathered at their own Capitol to appropriately air their grievances in protest at their Capitol but embedded amongst their number was a FBI asset that had been working from within their group online for many months.

Tucker Carlson: It's such a crime. Who planned this do you think?

US Rep Clay Higgins: You asked who planned this. This would be the combination of several of the most extreme liberal anti-Trump anti-America First factions that were in position of authority within out federal law enforcement organizations. And the Democrat party across the country.

Tucker Carlson: Did you come across any evidence that the DoD, the military, either defense intelligence agencies, or National Guard, or any part of US military played any role in this at all?

US Rep Clay Higgins: I did review evidence, Tucker, regarding suspicions of military involvement in some way. I do not think that the military was involved. Not at that level. Most certainly not at the level of the FBI and over the course of all of 2020.

Tucker Carlson: I want to go back to something you said in the first sentence which is you have seen evidence and that spurred your questions to Chris Wray that there were FBI assets dressed as Trump supporters within the Capitol. So that is proof of entrapment. Because, of course, the federal government could have prevented entry into the Capitol building. There aren't that many doors. You work there. You know. But they allowed people in on purpose to entrap them. That's what that proves, I think. Does it not?

US Rep Clay Higgins: Well it certainly condemning. It's another piece of the strategy that the government employed. To an edge where those Americans would likely have not gone had they not been encouraged by the FBI plant amongst their number that they didn't know was there.

In the interview Wooz News had with the MG Show, Wooz News was asked why Brian Gamble might be there. It was suggested that he was a plant, being paid, because he was in trouble with the law... basically a whole slew of conflicting accusations. But later on in the interview, something else was implied. It was stated that Brian Gamble was associated with General Flynn and possibly James O'Keefe. Neither General Flynn or James O'Keefe work for any law enforcement agency or government agency. Brian Gamble has been involved in this movement more than a couple years. That's a lot more than just a few months which these assets were embedded into the movement. So wouldn't the above testimony about FBI agents and FBI assets debunk that theory?

Why is that theory still being pushed around?

Wooz News Narrative Confronted

On January 13, 2024, a space was held on X (formerly known as Twitter) where Wooz News was being interviewed about his January 6 video footage. Brian Gamble confronted Wooz News about the accusations made against him. Wooz News claimed he didn't know who Brian Gamble was. Below is an audio clip from that space. You can find the full link to The 11th Hr: Live w/Wooz News recording, which was aired on January 13, 2023 by Tisha, here on X (formerly known as Twitter).

Transcript from The 11th Hour Space:

Brian Gamble: Hey everybody! Great space by the way. Super, super awesome. Wooz News, huge fan of your work. I see Shannon Townsend (ShadyGrooove from the MG Show) in here. MG Show, what's up? Tell you what, your show on their with MG Show was spectacular. One day I looked up and realized I was an actor and I didn't even know it. It's kind of amazing when you stumble upon these things firsthand. Anyways, glad to be here. The Ashli Babbit thing, I mean... I think... Jeremiah is saying it the best way you can say it. But you weren't there. I seriously doubt any of you here, maybe a few, have actually been in a scenario where you've seen corpses where they have been ruptured in the shoulder. There's a lot of arteries in the shoulder. You can die from internal bleeding from a shot to the shoulder internally. But the fact of the matter is, and I heard Wooz News, Ra, whatever your name is, call Laura Logan a B***. Well that B*** Laura Logan goes a lot further into her investigations when she tried to find information. So, some of the things that you guys should try to do, and this is just professional courtesy here, maybe reach out to the people that you are making accusations against. Maybe have a conversation with the people you are claiming that are crises actors or actors. I guess I'm an actor. Please explain to me why I was at J6 to fake an insurrect... Whatever in the f*** you guys are saying that I did. I'm here. Ask me your questions. Do what you're supposed to do. Right? Like Laura Logan does. Be a journalist. And let's figure out the truth is. I'm here. I don't know why y'all keep avoiding me. But here I am. Wooz Clues, ShadyGrooove... I don't know where your sidekick is but I'm here. Ask what you want.

Unknown: Like how Laura Logan reposted my post of Wooz News' documentary? Is that what you are talking about?

Brian Gamble: I'm saying I hear you call her a B***.

Wooz News: I called her a B*** lovingly and I think it's clearly evident that I said that in love and faith. And now you are turning... I don't know who you are. Umm... But...

Brian Gamble: You don't know who I am! Oh my goodness. Oy!!! You should watch your own footage and your own shows that you're on. Can we help him out? Can we get Shady (from the MG Show) a mic? Maybe Shannon Townsend (aka ShadyGrooove from the MG Show) can help him out. Who am I Shannon?

Wooz News: I don't know what's your question, brother.

Brian Gamble: My question is how do I wake up unknowingly a crisis actor on J6?

Wooz News: I didn't call you a crisis actor. I don't know. Are you one? Why are you here?

Tisha: Yeah.

Brian Gamble: Were you on the MG Show? Did you listen to the show that you were on? Did you listen to the people talk that you're on? Their own show?

Tisha: They made those claims. Not Wooz News.

Brian Gamble: Wooz was on their show! They used Wooz's footage. They used his whole story. So I am saying I am here and I would like to know if I am a crisis... You don't know who I am? So I am a crisis actor? Can we give ShadyGrooove a mic? I am here. He and Jeffrey Peterson (aka InTheMatrixxx from the MG Show) said I was a crisis actor on J6. Or an actor. Or whatever the hell you are claiming.

Unknown: They never said crisis actor.

Brian Gamble: I'm an actor. Me and Boone Cutler are actors. Or whatever for General Flynn. I am just simply saying, you were on their show. They were using your footage. They were saying this stuff on the show. So I am here in person, in flesh and blood. And I am just curious. What am I? Cause I'm thoroughly confused.

Wooz News: I have a question for you. Why did you go to J6?

Brian Gamble: Well, I went to J6 to protest a stolen election. Next question.

Wooz News: Did you see Trump speak?

Brian Gamble: I started hearing Trump speak but I realized real quick that I have heard that speech a lot. So me and my friend, Tim Hart, decided to go to the Capitol early. He had a speak that we could actually hear the speech. So we started walking down Constitution Boulevard there and got to the Capitol. The outer perimeter I guess you could call it. Next question.

Wooz News: That was my only question.

Brian Gamble: Anybody else? Shady (from the MG Show)! Come on, Shady! You got a lot to say on your show, buddy. Somebody throw that poor guy a mic.

There certainly was a lot put into Wooz News videos and put on the MG Show. Accusations were made. Unfounded accusations.

When I questioned Brian Gamble and asked him for a quote, he did make one clarifying statement about what was said in that space on January 13, 2024. Here is his statement:

I made an error when answering to Rafa/Wooznews in a recent X Space that "I started hearing Trump speak but I realized real quick that I have heard that speech a lot". It being 3 years back, I recall now actually leaving before President Trump spoke because I was bored with the speeches being given and I wanted to go find a spot early to get good shots of what I thought would be President Trump walking to the Capitol with a million supporters to peacefully protest the pending certification of a stolen election. It was over 3 years ago and most of what I recall was what happened at the Capitol because it was shocking. This memory lapse hardly equates to being involved in organized insurrection efforts as the MG Show is claiming under the guise of "we're just asking questions".

— Brian Gamble

It is important to note when reading this Brian Gamble has heard President Trump speak many times. He has been to many rallies.

Wooz News gave an interview with the MG Show on August 2, 2023. This was 5 months prior to the conversation Brian Gamble had with Wooz News in the space on X where he asked about the narrative being painted about him. On the MG Show, Brian Gamble's name was brought up throughout the show. His involvement on January 6, 2021 was discussed. Brian Gamble's name was specifically mentioned several times. But Wooz News didn't know who he was.

Here is an excerpt from that interview:

InTheMatrixxx: Yeah. There's area closed. This is him right here. This is your character Q. And there it is there. Walking in. This is Barrier 1 if I am correct. Here he is leaning on the barrier. And then if you look at right here, Brian Gamble's hat is right here. And he's the one filming Q. So he stayed with him all the way up to the front. Here he is here. Again. And this is from his court papers. This is him pushing the barrier in. And here's Gamble, right here, filming him doing it. There he is there. We don't see Gamble. He's standing up here. I'm just, you know, questioning. There he is there. There he is here. And he's waving people in.

Wooz News: What's your question?

InTheMatrixxx: If your there early, why are people there that early? Like Gamble.

Wooz News: To get paid. To get paid. Or they have a sentence. Or they want something to go away. You know.

ShadyGrooove: Right.

Wooz News: Like a charge. You see that quite often. Money. A lesser sentence for a charge they have been convicted of. Fifteen minutes of fame. Mostly money. An adventure.

InTheMatrixxx: An adventure... And its tied to somebody that we know in this movement named General Flynn. That's the only thing why this could be done separate. I got to put the full context out there. We don't know what is going on, guys. We just know that somebody that's tied to... and now apparently that Brian Gamble is working for James O'Keefe I hear, which was also your star.

Author's Note

Why write about this? It isn't your fight.

No. It isn't my fight. But it should be all of our fights. When we see a false narrative being pushed around for the sole purpose of getting views and "more internet famous," every single one of us should speak out about it. A man's good name is being smeared. Serious accusations are being made. All of this being done without the even the minimal effort of research it seems. And for what? So that you will have content? Donations? More likes and views?

A country is just land with borders. If we aren't willing to stand up for each other, what are we fighting for? Is what we are fighting for even worth it at that point? To fight for things and ideas... but not the people.

So to answer your question. Yes. It is most definitely my fight. It was my fight when I wrote about the same thing going on in Con Inc and the Red Pilled Antifa. People were faking accounts and affiliations in order to turn people over to the federal government. And those people being turned over were only exercising their right to exist. To live. To protest peacefully. To air their grievances to an uncaring government. Basically they were persecuted because they had more courage than others.

If you want to read the Con Inc and the Red Pilled Antifa series, here it is.

Part 1: Disinformation and Chaos for Hire

Part 2: Agents of Chaos and the Rabbit Hole That Led Me To Them

Part 3: Connections of Chaos and The Red Pilled Antifa

Part 4: Con Inc and Money for Chaos

Part 5: The Architects of Chaos

Part 6: The Reality of Chaos